Pluripotency of a Founding Field: Rebranding Developmental Biology

Authors

Crystal D. Rogers, School of Veterinary Medicine
Chris Amemiya, UC Merced
Swathi Arur, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Leslie Babonis, Cornell University
Michael Barresi, Smith CollegeFollow
Madelaine Bartlett, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Richard Behringer, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Blair Benham-Pyle, Baylor College of Medicine
Dominique Bergmann, Stanford University
Ben Blackman, University of California, Berkeley
C. Titus Brown, School of Veterinary Medicine
Bill Browne, College of Arts and Sciences
Jasmin Camacho, Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Chiswili Yves Chabu, University of Missouri
Ida Chow, Society For Developmental Biol
Ondine Cleaver, UT Southwestern Medical School
Jonah Cool, Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Megan Y. Dennis, UC Davis MIND Institute
Alexandra Jazz Dickinson, University of California, San Diego
Stefano Di Talia, Duke University Medical Center
Margaret Frank, Cornell University
Stewart Gillmor, Centro de Investigacion y de Estudio Avanzados, Campus Guanajuato
Eric S. Haag, College of Computer, Mathematical, & Natural Sciences
Iswar Hariharan, University of California, Berkeley
Richard Harland, University of California, Berkeley
Aman Husbands, University of Pennsylvania
Loydie Jerome-Majewska, L'Institut de Recherche du Centre Universitaire de Santé McGill
Kristen Koenig, Harvard University
Carole Labonne, Northwestern University
Michael Layden, Lehigh University
Chris Lowe, Stanford University
Madhav Mani, Northwestern University

Author ORCID Identifier

Crystal D. Rogers: l0000-0002-9549-1089

Siobhan Brady: 0000-0001-9424-8055

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2024

Publication Title

Development (Cambridge)

Abstract

The field of developmental biology has declined in prominence in recent decades, with off-shoots from the field becoming more fashionable and highly funded. This has created inequity in discovery and opportunity, partly due to the perception that the field is antiquated or not cutting edge. A 'think tank' of scientists from multiple developmental biology-related disciplines came together to define specific challenges in the field that may have inhibited innovation, and to provide tangible solutions to some of the issues facing developmental biology. The community suggestions include a call to the community to help 'rebrand' the field, alongside proposals for additional funding apparatuses, frameworks for interdisciplinary innovative collaborations, pedagogical access, improved science communication, increased diversity and inclusion, and equity of resources to provide maximal impact to the community.

Volume

151

Issue

3

First Page

1

Last Page

8

DOI

10.1242/dev.202342

ISSN

09501991

Comments

Free Access.

Share

COinS