To access this work you must either be on the Smith College campus OR have valid Smith login credentials.

On Campus users: To access this work if you are on campus please Select the Download button.

Off Campus users: To access this work from off campus, please select the Off-Campus button and enter your Smith username and password when prompted.

Non-Smith users: You may request this item through Interlibrary Loan at your own library.

Publication Date

2016-5

Document Type

Honors Project

Department

Biological Sciences

Keywords

Staurois-Behavior, Staurois-Evolution, Frogs-Behavior, Frogs-Evolution, Androgens-Receptors, Testosterone-Receptors, Sexual selection in animals, Display behavior in animals, Behavior, Evolution, Androgen, Testosterene, Foot-flagging, Frog, Sexual selection, Display

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of multimodal signaling behavior through a comparative investigation using three species--Staurois parvus, Rana pipiens, and Xenopus laevis. S. parvus is one of only about twenty frog species in the world that exhibits the communication signal known as foot-flagging, a conspicuous visual signal involving the outstretch of the frog’s hindlimb that evolved to attract female mates in the noisy environment in which they live. To regulate the production of this unique behavior, evolution might have coopted an existing mechanism in S. parvus physiology. Specifically, foot-flagging may have evolved along with androgen sensitivity of the spinal circuits controlling the foot, resulting in S. parvus having a significantly higher density of androgen receptor mRNA expression in lumbar areas of the spinal cord than both R. pipiens and X. laevis, two non foot-flagging species. However, results from this study indicate that there is no significant difference in the density of androgen receptor expression in spinal motor nucleus ten of the three species. Future studies should investigate the influence of androgens on aspects of the leg muscles involved in outstretching the hindlimb, including muscle fiber size and relaxation time between activation periods.

Language

English

Comments

51 pages : illustrations (some color). Honors project, Smith College, 2016. Includes bibliographical references (pages 38-40)

Share

COinS