Publication Date
2017
Document Type
Masters Thesis
Study Type
Qualitative
Degree Name
Master of Social Work
Department
School for Social Work
Keywords
Vulnerability (Personality trait), Psychotherapist and patient, Interpersonal psychotherapy, Psychotherapists-Psychology, Therapeutic alliance, Countertransference (Psychology), Self-disclosure, Intersubjectivity.Vulnerability, Relational psychotherapy, Therapeutic relationship, Mutuality, Wounded healer, Mutual transformation, Countertransference, Professional development, Phenomenological research
Abstract
The current study examined how clinicians practicing relational psychotherapy experience their own vulnerability in the therapeutic relationship with clients. The study followed a qualitative, phenomenological research methodology. The researcher interviewed ten experienced clinicians who practice relational psychotherapy. Four major themes emerged as significant findings. First, vulnerability was described as a quality of engagement in the therapeutic relationship that is open, engaged, and resonant. Second, participants expressed a sense of risk associated with mutual vulnerability. Third, participants emphasized the importance of mutual vulnerability for client’s healing. Fourth, participants described vulnerability as a developmental capacity. These findings have significance for the field of relational psychotherapy, especially training of new clinicians.
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Powers, Christine, "Clinician vulnerability : openness to influence in relational therapy" (2017). Masters Thesis, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
https://scholarworks.smith.edu/theses/1915
Comments
iii, 117 pages. Includes bibliographical references (page 100-105)