To access this work you must either be on the Smith College campus OR have valid Smith login credentials.

On Campus users: To access this work if you are on campus please Select the Download button.

Off Campus users: To access this work from off campus, please select the Off-Campus button and enter your Smith username and password when prompted.

Non-Smith users: You may request this item through Interlibrary Loan at your own library.

Publication Date

2017

First Advisor

Joyce Everett

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

Department

School for Social Work

Keywords

Social work, Supervision, Relationship, Education, Self-efficacy

Abstract

The Council of Social Work Education has identified field education as the signature pedagogy of social work. The current study explored 674 early career social workers' recollection of their second year supervisory relationship in an effort to clarify potential links between specific aspects of the relationship and workers' self-efficacy beliefs relative to commonly practiced social work skills. The Sample was gathered from a larger sample of practicing Social Workers across the U.S., with between six months and five years of experience. The study implicitly examined the construct validity of an analogy between the therapeutic working alliance and the supervisory working alliance. Results revealed that a supervisor's comfort with a supervisee's negative feelings, a flexible and negotiable stance in supervision, and an agreement on tasks in supervision were significant predictors of subsequent self-efficacy beliefs. The affective bond between supervisor and supervisee was not a significant predictor of worker self-efficacy beliefs

Rights

©2019 Jean-Paul Des Pres. Access limited to the Smith College community and other researchers while on campus. Smith College community members also may access from off-campus using a Smith College log-in. Other off-campus researchers may request a copy through Interlibrary Loan for personal use.

Language

English

Comments

204 pages : illustrations. Includes bibliographical references (pages 137-157)

Share

COinS