Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2017
Publication Title
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Abstract
Purpose
With no existing gold standard for comparison, challenges arise for establishing the validity of a new standardized Mandarin language assessment normed in mainland China.
Method
A new assessment, Diagnostic Receptive and Expressive Assessment of Mandarin (DREAM), was normed with a stratified sample of 969 children ages 2;6 (years;months) to 7;11 in multiple urban and nonurban regions in northern and southern China. In this study of 230 children, the sensitivity and specificity of DREAM were examined against an a priori judgment of disorders. External validity was assessed using 2 indices of language production for different age groups.
Results
External validity was assessed against spontaneous language indices (correlation range: r = .6–.7; all ps < .01) and narrative indices (overall: r = .45, p < .01). Sensitivity (.73) and specificity (.82) of DREAM are moderate to good using a priori judgment as the standard. The values improved to .95 and .82 when spontaneous language and narratives were added to a priori judgment to define typicality. Divergent validity was moderate with nonlinguistic indices.
Conclusion
DREAM holds promise as a diagnostic test of Mandarin language impairment for children aged 2;6 to 7;11.
Volume
60
Issue
3
First Page
592
Last Page
606
DOI
doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0334
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Rights
Licensed to Smith College and distributed CC-BY under the Smith College Faculty Open Access Policy.
Recommended Citation
Liu, Xueman Lucy; de Villiers, Jill; Ning, Chunyan; Rolfhus, Eric; Hutchings, Teresa; Lee, Wendy; Jiang, Fan; and Zhang, Yi Wen, "Research to Establish the Validity, Reliability, and Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive Language Assessment of Mandarin" (2017). Philosophy: Faculty Publications, Smith College, Northampton, MA.
https://scholarworks.smith.edu/phi_facpubs/42
Comments
Peer reviewed accepted manuscript.